Some people worry that government is playing too big of a role in peopleʼs lives and therefore, shouldnʼt be responsible for decisions about what people eat. For example, the former Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, wanted to limit the sizes of sugary drinks in New York City. Do you think the government should step in and set limits, or leave it up to the public to decide what to consume?

Based on what you're saying, 'limit the sizes of sugary drinks', 'decide what to consume', and things like that, I'd have to say:

On these kind of things, it's up to the people what they want to do. If they want to consume all the soda in the world, that's their choice. Not mine, not their friends, and certainly not the government.

Explanation:

What many think about this problem is the government should step in and set limits to help future health problems/risks in the future. This will allow the government to spend less money on the health risks that come with not setting a limit of what you're consuming.

Explanation:

This is what I would put just tell me if I answered it wrong and I will re do it

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is (c) the concentration of active ingredients in a medication

relationship between pressure and air volume and led to the understanding of how respiration works; i believe this is the correct answer ; /// good luck