subject
History, 01.10.2019 02:30 kiraswife

Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. —alexander hamilton, the federalist paper 84 what point is alexander hamilton making? a. a bill of rights was necessary for ratification. b. a bill of rights should include only certain rights. c. the constitution did not need a bill of rights. d. the constitution is stronger with a bill of rights.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:10
Lloyd’s of london was one of the first institutions to offer insurance to merchants and joint-trade companies. a major part of the insurance system involved people who agreed to take responsibility for the insured losses in return for a fee. what were these risk-takers known as? a. joint-stock companies b. investors c. underwriters d. merchants e. capitalists
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:50
What misguided strategy caused lord william howe and the british to fail?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Brainliesttt !me : ) what was the result of indian independence?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
What effect did ww11 have on empires that had been created by european nations
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are conte...
Questions
question
Spanish, 07.11.2020 20:40
question
Social Studies, 07.11.2020 20:40
Questions on the website: 13722367