Based on the schenk v. united states case, when might it be acceptable for the government to restrict information released by the press? the government can never restrict information released by the press. the government can only restrict information when it could be harmful to an individual’s reputation. the government can only restrict information released when practicing prior restraint. the government can only restrict information that could present an immediate threat to security or the public.

the correct answer is "the government can only restrict information that could present an immediate threat to security or the public." the schenk v. united states was a case regarding the espionage act of 1917 during the world war i in which the court decided that any individual who presented any time of danger would be punished, and the case served as basis for other similar cases where there was threat or danger of harm.

the answer is catholics

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality.