In september 1990, a little more than a month after iraq invaded kuwait, president george h. w. bush gave a speech to congress in which he described "a world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. a world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. a world where the strong respect the rights of the weak." read the speech again, and then list the pros and cons of such a policy. what might the role of the united states be in global affairs based on this policy?

This is my paraphrasing of the other answer for Plato

   Some pros of this policy could be the alliances between countries, countries joining together against threats. There would be alliances for war and the well-being of the people. It would put the us in a good light as well and make them seem in a position to help others.

     In turn though there are also a few cons. It could put United States in a position to have to help a country in a way they are not prepared for such as money and fighting. It also does not clearly state where the US stands on the alliance. Without specifications there could be too many or too little limits to their involvement.

answer; /// i believe the three where,tutankhamun,hatshepsut and , im not sure,but maybe (ramses the great)