Which statement accurately contrasts how judaism and christianity developed? a. judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people, while christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world. b. judaism developed from the growth of polytheism, while christianity developed through the development of theocracy. c. judaism developed through the spread of the greek language, while christianity developed through the roman occupation of jerusalem. d. judaism developed through the persecution of the jewish people, while christianity developed through the lack of persecution of its followers.

A. Judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people, while Christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world.

Explanation:

Judaism is the millennial religion of a single nation of people: the Hebrew people. In this sense, Judaism is not a universal religion, it means that, while it is not impossible for non-Jews to convert to Judaism, Jews does not seek to convert other people to Judaism because it is only practiced by those who are born within the Hebrew people.

Christianity, on the other hand, was born as a branch of Judaism in the 1st century AD, and it was born as a universal religion, meaning that Christians of every century tried to spread their beliefs across the world. Christians practitioners in charge of spreading the Christian message to non-Christians are known as missionaries. For this reason, Christianity expanded through almost every continent to the point of becoming the largest religion (or set of religions) in the world today.

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.

i dont no the claim so it's hard to answer but i think he would go to the people to decide. : ) ; )