The decision in the arizona v. california case was significant because it a. allowed states to take water when they wanted from the colorado river. b. denied water sharing right to arizona based on population results. c. determined that california needed more water due to its sizable produce industry. d. stated lower basin states could use water from tributaries as needed before that water entered the colorado river.

it would have concentrated power in the executive branch of the government. it would have restored balance among the three branches of government. it would have set a precedent for government intervention in the economy. it would have signaled an end to all the programs of roosevelt’s new deal.

did this .

general allotment act (dawes act) february 8, 1887

amendment to the dawes act, february 28, 1891

commission to the five civilized tribes (dawes commission), march 3, 1893