The state educator’s undeniably vital, mandate to teach moral and political values is not a general warrant to act as “thought police” stifling discussion of all but state-approves topics official censorship that it addresses “potentially sensitive topics” is impermissible. the reasoning in this opinion is most similar to the reasoning in which other supreme court ruling? a. tinker v. des moines b. new jersey v. t. l.o. c. gideon v. wainwright d. miranda v. arizona