While researching internet articles, jane realizes that many of the facts and viewpoints in an article by d smith differ drastically from other articles she has found on the same topic. what action should jane do next to determine the article’s reliability? analyze the author’s background to evaluate any potential bias evaluate each article’s main idea to expose generalizations compare d smith's point of view to your own discredit and remove d smith’s article from her sources

Analyze the author’s background to evaluate any potential bias.

Explanation:

This is the best strategy for Jane to follow. It is always useful to analyze the authors' background when researching a particular topic, as this allows us to establish whether the authors are reliable sources. However, this is even more important in cases in which the author's opinions prove to be an anomaly. In these cases, it is likely that the author writes in this way because of bias.

most are appointed by the president and confirmed by a vote in the senate. however, appeals court judges appoint federal bankruptcy judges, and district judges appoint federal magistrate judges. the qualifications for these positions vary depending on the preferences of the person reviewing nominees.

hope this , give me brainliest answer = )