How did the decision in regents v. bakke affect individual rights? it limited rights by encouraging greater use of racial quotas. a- t limited rights by encouraging greater use of racial quotas. it protected rights by letting race be an admissions factor. it limited rights by giving all minorities higher priority. it protected rights by making all individuals equal.

It protected rights by letting race be an admissions factor.

In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program.  But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, with schools needing to practice great care in doing so.  Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.

in contrast, the biological controls are self-sustaining, inexpensive and very effective once established. biological control could be used on thousands of golf course acres, improving their biodiversity and quality as wildlife habitat. in the process, the golf industry will be shown to be leaders in an environmental stewardship program of benefit not only to the lands they manage but also to the watersheds in which they exist.