How did characteristics of british colonization differ from spanish colonization?

primarily around the struggle of England, France, and

Spain to gain control of the continent. Settlers

crossed the Atlantic for different reasons, and their

governments took different approaches to their colonizing

efforts. These differences created both advantages

and disadvantages that profoundly affected the

New World’s fate. France and Spain, for instance,

were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule

was absolute; their colonists went to America as servants

of the Crown. The English colonists, on the

other hand, enjoyed far more freedom and were able

to govern themselves as long as they followed English

law and were loyal to the king. In addition, unlike

France and Spain, England encouraged immigration

from other nations, thus boosting its colonial population.

By 1763 the English had established dominance

in North America, having defeated France and Spain

in the French and Indian War. However, those

regions that had been colonized by the French or

Spanish would retain national characteristics that

linger to this day

s the president shall be commander in chief of the army and navy of the united states, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the united states; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments. sooo yeahhh

explanation:

hr2520 is the patient's act. there is required the secretary of health to summon a committee to develop a national strategic plan of prevention. this committee has forth provisions that make possible for the govern entities to acquire private health insurance services.

is easier to keep this hr2520 as federal, because that way the secretary of health has centralized power to deal with private insurance companies and the federas government has more ways and power to negotiate with them, than doing this process state by state in their specific terms.