Why did france have constant rivalries with england and spain? a. france didn’t join the trade alliance made by england and spain for trade in the americas b. france was at war with spain and england, which it continue in the americas c. french settlers claimed a large piece of land down the mississippi river for france d. french for traders mono paralyz french fur traders monopolize the for trade because of relationships with native american tribes

There have been many different conflicts between France,Britain and Spain along the history for different reasons therefore, it is necessary to consider that when America was discovered and these countries started moving their interests to  America, so did their conflicts, specially regarding trade of goods and  territorial domination.

An alliance between Britan and Spain for trading in America, does not seem quite realistic,although,the South Sea Company, a British company created in 1711  to trade with South America, did not really register any significant benefit, so it is possible to conclude that Spain would not really share its monopoly through an alliance, so A is not probably a good choice.

The dispute for territories in America resulted in France transfering its territories of French Luisiana to Spain, its ally back then as a compensation for Spanish loss of Florida, which had to be given to Britain in exchange for The Havanna in Cuba. From these facts, it is easy to conclude that the French claims for territories probably was not too strong, so C might not be a solid choice either.

Finally, the fur trade and the alliances with Native tribes was rather a consequence of the territorial domination and the trade monopoly, so,there were stronger reasons for conflict between these countries, hence, instead of  B, the most appropriate answer would be B, because as stated above, when Spain, France and Britain moved their interests to America, they moved their conflicts with them.

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."