“probable cause” protects a person’s rights by making sure
the police can do their job.
public property can be easily searched.
the person receives legal representation.
private property is searched only when reasonable.

The correct answer is: "private property is searched only when reasonable".

The probable clause is granted by the US Consitution and it guarantees that police authorities can only perform searchs or arrests over suspects or their properties when a search warrant has been previously enacted by the judiciary authorities, stating that such search is reasonable. The aim is to set limits to the action of police and to prevent abusive and illegal search and seizures.

“Probable cause” protects a person’s rights by making sure that private property is searched only when reasonable.

Further Explanations:

Probable cause cited, is the customary by which police forces are given authority to obtain an authorization for the custody of suspected criminals through a search warrant. It also acts as standards for grand Juries through which they can issue unlawful indictment. The main motive of the standard was to verge the powers of the authorities, to execute unsystematic searches. It aimed to promote gathering and processing of lawful evidence during trial and arrest of any criminal. The term itself is derived from the 4th Amendment of the United States’ constitution.

United States’ Preamble gives a brief summary of the constitution and its principles and purposes. Founding Fathers hoped to institute unbiased rights and Freedom for themselves and for their forthcoming generation. Most of the clauses mentioned in were farmed in accordance with the future benefits. Framer framed it in such a manner that it will be beneficial at that time and in the future.  

Learn more :

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Probable cause

Keywords: Probable cause, United States’, Preamble, principles, purposes, rights, Freedom, customary, police force, authorization, of suspected criminals, Grand Juries, authorities, 4th Amendment

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.

can someone just answer this