Which statement about the pullman strike is true?

the pullman strike ended quickly because of negotiations by eugene v. debs and the american railway union.

the pullman strike unions gain national support and led to legal protections for unions.

the pullman company averted bankruptcy by refusing to give in to the demands of workers.

the pullman company lost more money fighting the strike than it would have paid out by giving in to workers.

The correct answer is “The Pullman Company lost more money fighting the strike than it would have paid out by giving in to workers”

The Pullman strike was a railroad strike and boycott in the Midwest of the US. The causes of the strike were because the company cut the wages of its workers by 25% and did not reduce the rents and other charges of the company’s workers company town.

The workers led by Eugene V. Debs joined the American Railroad Union spread across the US. There were no negotiations with Pullman. Debs was arrested on federal charges.  After the strike the company had to sell the residential holdings and lost money and had property damage of over 80 million dollars.

The Pullman Company lost more money fighting the strike than it would have paid out by giving in to workers.

it was georgia from union general william t. sherman. hope it !

answer; i believe the correct answer is (favorable balance);