Which statement best summarizes the major difference between the social gospel movement and the evangelicals of the gilded age? followers of the social gospel movement spent time trying to save souls, while evangelicals spent time trying to raise church attendance. followers of the social gospel movement focused on making life on earth better, while the evangelicals focused on the rewards waiting in heaven. followers of the social gospel movement believed that poverty was part of god’s plan on earth, while evangelicals believed that the rich were more fit. followers of the social gospel movement believed they had a duty to others, while evangelicals believed the wealthy should people in need.

The statement that best summarizes the major difference between the social gospel movement and the evangelicals of the Gilded Age would be that "B.Followers of the social gospel movement focused on making life on Earth better, while the evangelicals focused on the rewards waiting in heaven," since the formers methods focussed more on social ills.

one of the negative side effects were the economic losses the events of september 11th caused. many, many people lost their jobs as a result of a downturn in the economy after the terrorist attacks.

the caste system in india is the paradigmatic ethnographic example of caste. it has origins in ancient india, and was transformed by various ruling elites in medieval, early-modern, and modern india, especially the mughal empire and the british raj.it is today the basis of educational and job reservations in india.it consists of two different concepts, varna and jati, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.

the caste system as it exists today is thought to be the result of developments during the collapse of the mughal era and the british colonial regime in india. the collapse of the mughal era saw the rise of powerful men who associated themselves with kings, priests and ascetics, affirming the regal and martial form of the caste ideal, and it also reshaped many apparently casteless social groups into differentiated caste communities.the british raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration

i didn’t fully understand your question but i hope this you !