The preamble to the us constitution lays out the purposes of the constitution. which two purposes/goals are most important? how does the constitution fulfill each purpose? use specific examples in your response. what are the three most important characteristics that are necessary for a government to meet the needs of the people? explain why these traits are essential to success. give specific examples to support your arguments.

The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States is a brief introductory statement of fundamental declarative and introductory principles of the US Constitution. It establishes general terms and objectives that the courts use as a faithful reference to the intentions of the so-called Founding Fathers regarding the meaning of the Constitution and what they expected it to achieve.

Technically, the preamble of the Constitution of the United States does not give powers to entities within the federal government, however, the Supreme Court has cited the preamble in consideration of the history, intent and meaning of several clauses that follows in the Constitution. As Joseph Story said in his Commentaries, "Your real trade is to expose the nature and extent and application of the [lost words] that are conferred by the Constitution, and not to create them."

The phrase "WE, THE PEOPLE" is of singular importance because it stipulates that the power and authority of the federal government of the United States of America does not come from the various states or the people of the various states, but from an entity that is identified as the People of the United States of America, with the Constitution serving as a compact or contract between the People of the United States of America, the various states, and the new entity: the federal government of the United States of America. The importance of this language lies in the idea that the government does not derive its power only from the various states. This became a major contention issue during the Annulment Crisis and during the Civil War.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

some women in the middle and upper classes worked as doctors, government officials, or priestesses. both women and men enjoyed a better quality of life the higher they were on the social pyramid. the egyptians believed that their class system created a stable, well-ordered society. each group had its own role to play.