Brainliestt asap!me : ) how were peter the great (absolute monarch from russia) and charles | (constitutional monarch from england) similar? how did they differ? did one have more power than the other? how did the type of monarch each was, affect their nation?

Charles I was far from the great reformer that Peter the Great is remembered as.  Charles was not a very good ruler because he couldn't get along with parliament. Peter the Great seems to be a better ruler than Charles l.  Peter wanted to change his nation and did, but he couldn't make any real big changes because of financial reasons,   Charles l had do more for the people to please them,  When Charles l was king his monarchy was remembered for peace and prosperity.   During Peter the great monarch he attempted to established Russia as a great nation. He wanted to concentrate on developing commerce and industry.  He modernized the Russia alphabet, he introduced the Julian calendar, and even established the first newspaper in Russia.

under god i have placed my chiest strentgh and the safe guard to my loyal subjects

oil! is what i am assuming