How was john marshall’s interpretation of the constitution different from that of thomas jefferson’s? a) jefferson believed that judicial review was implied in the constitution; marshall did not. b) marshall believed the constitution implied strong state powers; jefferson did not. c) marshall believed the constitution granted strong federal powers; jefferson did not. d) jefferson believed the federal courts could overrule state courts; marshall did not.

The correct answer is C) Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

Marshall’s interpretation of the Constitution was different from that of Thomas Jefferson’s in that Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.  

mount st. helens in washington erupts, causing a massive avalanche and killing 57 people on this day in 1980. ash from the volcanic eruption fell as far away as minnesota. seismic activity at mount st. helens, which is 96 miles south of seattle, began on march 16.

i need the diagram.