Which best summarizes the opinions of british leaders neville chamberlain and winston churchill on appeasement? churchill opposed going to war with germany at all costs, while chamberlain believed that action was needed to stop german aggression. chamberlain opposed going to war with germany at all costs, while churchill believed that action was needed to stop german aggression. chamberlain believed that giving in to germany would lead to more threats, while churchill thought britain could avoid war by satisfying demands. churchill believed that negotiating with germany would prevent war, while chamberlain thought talking with hitler was pointless.

The correct answer is “Chamberlain opposed going to war with Germany at all costs, while Churchill believed that action was needed to stop German aggression”.

You can see Churchill’s opinion clearly because he heavily criticized the “Munich Pact”. Chamberlain thought that Germany would follow the deal and would not invade Czechoslovakia, this did not happen and Germany invaded the rest of the country in 1939, which proved the Pact did not prevail and Churchill was correct. Churchill’s opinion was that they should act to stop Germany before it was too late and that delay the war would bring even more chaos.

“Chamberlain opposed going to war with Germany at all costs, while Churchill believed that action was needed to stop German aggression”.

britian is way too advanced for me my good luck

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric