Which two arguments did the supreme court use to uphold the constitutionality of korematsu’s internment

The two principal arguments that the court take into account in favor of korematsu in his case against the United States are that Korematsu was in fact an American citizen, and that he did not committed any crime but living in America during World War II. Korematsu did not relocate when the order was given because he was born in the United States, while their parents that attended the relocation were born in Japan.

A. Due to the war, there was not enough time to hold trials or hearings before sending people to internment camps.

B. The military had a legitimate need to protect against espionage and sabotage

brainliest means the answer that is best and you found it very

if you ask any question and 2 persons gave you answer for your question and the answer of one person you liked the most and found it most the we can mark it as brainliest . at the side of every person's answer an option of brainliet then we can appericiate the user by marking it as brainlist

if someone marks our answer as brainliest then we can get ranks also

done.

the uk is a constitutional monarchy (with queen elizabeth ii as head of state) and a parliamentary democracy (with parliament as the legislative organ).

so it would be a parliamentary democracy under a constitutional monarchy