The war on poverty: question 37 options: a. was first proposed by richard nixon as a means to gain support of congressional democrats during eisenhower's second term. b. was not a part of johnson's great society agenda. c. concentrated on equipping the poor with skills and rebuilding their spirit and motivation. d. guaranteed an annual income for most americans. e. focused on understanding economic changes and responding to them

The War on Poverty was the name given in the Johnson administration that focused on a set of bills and laws to reduce poverty in the US. In 1964, Johnson announced a series of laws were intended to provide tools and education to the poor in order to live in decent conditions and to get a job. Among the laws and acts passes to reduce poverty were: “Economic Opportunity Act”, “Job Corps” and “Head Start”. All these acts were part of the “Great Society” program launched by the Johnson administration. In this case, option C) is the correct one “concentrated on equipping the poor with skills and rebuilding their spirit and motivation.”

Option A) is incorrect since the War on Poverty program was introduced in Johnson’s administration and not on Nixon’s.  

Option B) is also incorrect since the Great Society program included the War on Poverty

Option D) is also incorrect since the objective of the acts and laws passed to reduce poverty were focused on providing training, education and tools to the poor.

Finally, option E) is also incorrect since the acts and laws passed were not focused on understanding economic changes but on providing tools for the poor people to get a better life.  

the neutrality acts were passed by the united states congress in the 1930s, in response to the growing turmoil in europe and asia that eventually led to world war ii. they were spurred by the growth in isolationism and non-interventionism in the us following its costly involvement in world war i, and sought to ensure that the us would not become entangled again in foreign conflicts.

the legacy of the neutrality acts is widely regarded as having been generally negative: they made no distinction between aggressor and victim, treating both equally as "belligerents"; and they limited the us government's ability to aid britain and france against nazi germany. the acts were largely repealed in 1941, in the face of german submarine attacks on u.s. vessels and the japanese attack on pearl harbor.

hi did u tell us this and this is okay in the