Which nation practices the philosophy, obliteration of the self? question 20 options: a. eastasia b. eurasia c. oceania d. none of the above?

The correct answer is:  A. East Asia

The Obliteration of the self is how the totalitarian state of East Asia maintains its habitants under control and sympathetic of the regime; they use fright as their central instrument for controlling the habitants of the state. They used the people versus each other through hate, an uncontrollable  desire to kill others, uncertainty and retaliation. Vengeance, was used most often as a terror instrument in East Asia, due that the Asian power was the newest and most crowded super state, which meant that they had sufficient young people who still recall the times when they were somehow free in 1950s and 1960s. Many of these people experienced commotion in their lives and inevitably possessed indignation, hate and a desire for retaliation against those who denigrated them.

The East Asian government found in this method an ideal way to deal with opponents or dissidents, finding people who hold resentment or seek retaliation against he dissidents, and eventually let these vengeance seekers do as they wish to them. Not only, with this procedure, the state would get rid of the dissidents, but, these official killers and torturers would become loyal to the state.

This would give the state an endless supply of new soldiers into the East Asian army as well as real support for the state regardless the depressing living conditions; and when new generations are born the government will permit some liberty in order to let disagreements appear making people more vengeful. The people will be taught that death is the supreme fulfillment and that they should obliterate their feelings of mercy and pity.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

answer: idk

explanation: because i just don't