Interpret at the beginning of the speech why does king explain his reasons for speaking out against the vietnam war

At the beginning of Martin Luther King Jr's famous "Beyond Vietnam" speech, delivered on April 4th of 1967, he announced publicly for the first time his position against the Vietnam War.

King had been leading anti-war movements for a long while before voicing a profound concern about Southern and Northern Vietnam as the tensions started rising. He explained how it was natural for him to expand beyond the African American struggle towards peace movements, recognizing a fundamental bond tying the predicament for peace and the civil rights campaign.

Hope this helps!

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

the answer would be a i think?