The policy of the roosevelt corollary is best seen in question 3 options: the beginning of world war 2 england declaring war on the us in 1905 the us warning european interference in latin america would lead to us intervention the us invading mexico and panama in response to political uprisings

The answer is option 3: The US warning European interference in Latin America would lead to US intervention

The Roosevelt Corollary established that the United States would work as an international police power to the Western Hemisphere (Latin America), therefore if there existed any conflict between the European countries and Latin American countries, the United States would intervene to enforce legitimate claims (large debts, civil unrest, etc) of European, rather than having the Europeans press their claims directly.

The US warning that European interference in Latin America would lead to US intervention.

Details:

The Roosevelt Corollary was set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904 (in his State of the Union Address that year).  It was a tweaking of the Monroe Doctrine.  The Monroe Doctrine expressed US opposition to European interference in the Americas.  Roosevelt's corollary to that doctrine was that the United States would intervene in conflicts between European countries and Latin American countries, rather than having the Europeans press their claims directly.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

about 3,040,000 results (1.57 seconds)

explanation:

"o" (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 32 words.