How did austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement?

How did Austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement?

Austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement, in several ways. The Austronesian-speaking peoples moved in very short time, in over 2.500 years in a big area of the planet. Other migrations started before, Austronesian migrations started 3.500 year ago. Other migrations used the ocean to navigate, but the Austronesian migration went beyond, they carried domesticated animals and plants with incredible skills. Another different aspect is that the Austronesian-speaking peoples created graded social groups led by a chief when they arrived to the Pacific, which showed a clear purpose of colonization.

Austronesian migrations began 3.500 years ago, and it is considered different from other human migrations because they were waterborne ones. They use navigational skills differing from other people all over the planet whose main skills were the agricultural ones. They were migrations of men, women and domesticated animals.

the quote by walter cronkite contributes to the central idea of the text by supporting the central idea. cronkite argues that what is deemed “right” for and in america may not be good for other countries. this supports the central idea of the text, that the vietnam war was unpopular in america for multiple reasons- including cronkite’s.