Given the risks, should canada have developed nuclear energy?

Canada probably did the right thing by not developing the nuclear energy. The nuclear energy is very clean, and it is also very effective and produces a lot, being relatively cheap too. On the other hand, it comes with the risk of making a huge catastrophe. Since Canada has lot of rivers, especially large ones, it is capable of producing more than enough energy, and plus not having the risks that the nuclear energy brings with it. Also, the country has very small population, and even though the economy is well developed, it is not that big of consumer of energy when compared with the largest economies, thus it is able to produce clean energy, risk free, without any problem for itself.

your answer would be 12 stories

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!