People detained in battlefields around the world that were suspected of engaging in terroristic activities against the united states were detained at the us military base in cuba known as guantanamo bay. this method of handling suspected terrorists raised outcries about the proper application of laws regarding those accused of crimes. based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper trial? what argument could be made for holding suspected terrorists without formally charging them with crimes and giving them a day in us court?

One can evoke the Universal Declaration of Humans, articles 9 and 10 assert the right of fair judgment and one can add that it is based on the simple fact that all of us want fair treatment and not arbritary justice.

On the other hand, maybe to save the lives of thousands of people, sometimes it wouldbe necessary strong coersion to get vital intel on the location of a dangerous leader or weapons of mass destruction.

FOR ARGUMENTS:

AGAINST ARGUMENTS:

a.opium

hope this

on the succession of solomon's son, rehoboam, around 930 bce, the biblical account reports that the country split into two kingdoms: the kingdom of israel (including the cities of shechem and samaria) in the north and the kingdom of judah (containing jerusalem) in the south.