History, 26.06.2019 15:00 chynad6395

Compare and contrast the impact of post civil war innovation to that of the pre civil war market revolution

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: rebtav

The impact of the post-civil war innovation can be compared to that of the pre-civil war market revolution in the following ways.

Before the war, and as part of the Market Revolution, the Industrial Revolution transformed the life of the people in the northern states.Factories were established, creating jobs to operate the machines and instill mass production.However, in the southern states, industrialization was not part of this region of the country.Southern people depended so much on agriculture and slavery.Large plantation owners depended on slaves who worked long hours in the plantation fields producing cash crops.Indeed, the economy of the South totally depended on agriculture, while in the North, the economy was based on industrialization.After the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln ordered Reconstruction in the South.The North had won the war and industries represented a big factor in the victory.During Reconstruction, some industries and fabrics started to move to the South to industrialize that part of the country.However, the South still heavily depended on agriculture. Post-Civil War Innovation tried to modernize the South, offering jobs in the fabrics.Conditions also imrpoved through modern railroads that enhanced the transportation of people and goods.

We conclude that industrialization change the face of the United States and after the Civil War.

Innovations in the field of mass production, technology, and weaponry, strengthen the nation's economy.

Nevertheless, social issues such as racism, Jim Crow laws, and the black codes, still hurt the southern states.

Learn more about this topic here:

link

Compare and contrast the impact of post civil war innovation to that of the pre civil war market rev

Answer from: Quest

pls be more elaborate

Answer from: Quest

"a problem throughout latin america is widespread poverty. what can those countries improve? the higher the literacy rate" or "education, the lower the rate of poverty".

although the majority of the total population and the population poor in latin america and the caribbean is in the centers urban areas, in relative terms poverty remains a rural phenomenon in the region. the incidence of poverty and extreme poverty is much greater in rural areas than in urban areas without going further, in 1997 more than half of the rural households lived in poverty and about a third in situation of extreme poverty. in addition, the difficult economic situation of most of the countries in the region in the past two years has surely deteriorated those figures. to the poor of the rural areas of the region are raised at least three basic problems: i); insufficient nutrition, poor health and poor educational services; ii); scarce opportunities productive employment in agriculture and non-agricultural activities; and iii); low degree of organization to effectively promote the rural interests. the number and variety of circumstances that cause rural poverty, as well as heterogeneity of conditions in which it occurs in different countries and regions hinder the search for effective solutions and efficient to raise the welfare of the rural population.

the mechanisms to reduce poverty are focuses on three types of important action possibilities and complementary to generate or raise the income of the poor of rural areas: one that is based on the growth of agricultural sector; another that aims at sustainable use and conservation of natural resources, and the last based on the importance growing rural economic activities that they develop outside the agricultural land. there are at least other two possibilities for reducing rural poverty: the traditional migration to urban areas and assistance to people who need income transfers to overcome the poverty threshold or to have a minimum access to social safety nets.