Which text is valuable for gaining context about a history bit but is unreliable as evidence which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence

Hmm... your question is a bit too vague (since there were no options included) but I will answer it to the best of my ability... a secondary source is valuable for gaining context about history but is unreliable as evidence.

There are two sources I know of: primary sources and secondary sources.

A primary source is like a the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc. Primary sources don't have the the immediacy of the original thing.

A secondary source is like a textbook, as it was written to add to the primary source, and maybe biased.

Other possible answers to your question are: encyclopedia, anthology, historical fiction/history novel.

I hope that helps! :)

france,russia and prussia had absolute monarchy and it meant:

when louis xiv inherited the throne, he was able to serve as his chief minister.louis xiv ruled as an absolute monarch.

c. free trade can lead to low pay for workers in poorer countries.