What was the federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution? it might be used later to limit rights that weren’t originally listed. it was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms. it was unnecessary because the new government had limited power. it might be used later to free enslaved people in the west.

It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed, is one of the arguments that could be held from either Federalist or Anti-Federalist. The fear being that if the constitution says you have 'these' rights, then the rights it doesn't state can be exploited. Another view is that if the rights were clearly stated, they can be legislated out of existence. Such is the case today.

It should also be stated this was not a popular view among Federalist, this was a popular view among Anti-Federalist.

"I do not like... the omission of a bill of rights providing clearly and without the aid of sophisms for freedom of religion, freedom of the press, protection against standing armies, restriction against monopolies, the eternal and unremitting force of the habeas corpus laws, and trials by jury in all matters of fact triable by the laws of the land and not by the law of nations." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787. ME 6:387

the correct answer is a) egypt and china.

egypt and china are two of the world’s oldest civilizations known by man. both ancient empires have left a great historic and cultural legacy to the world through archeology. both civilzations developed complex social relations, had deep religious beliefs, had dominion of agriculture and left writing records to understand their customs and culture.

among the requirements to consider a civilization, we find urbanization, writing records, a place of residence, agriculture methods, technological specialization, means of transportation, currency, population density, social stratification, and political integration.

on 6 november american voters will elect members of the house of representatives and the senate, which together are called congress.

both houses of congress are currently controlled by the republican party, which backs president donald trump.

the democrats think they can win control of the house of representatives this year by winning a majority of seats.

doing so would let them block or delay the president’s plans by refusing to enact them.

all 435 seats in the house of representatives are up for election.

if the democrats want to take control of the house by having the most seats, they’re going to have to claim at least 23 from the republicans.

graphic: the battle for the house of representatives