What did us involvement in nicaragua reveal about the reagan administration? it thought it had stopped the spread of communism. it was willing to operate outside the law to achieve its goals. it was important to operate with the full support of the american people. it believed that the threat posed by communism was exaggerated.

The following was revealed about the Reagan administration with US involvement in Nicaragua :

Explanation:

US commitment in Nicaragua reveal about the Reagan organization is that it was prepared to work outside the law to achieve its objectives. The Reagan association's procedure towards Nicaragua conveyed a vital clash between the official and authoritative arms as Congress attempted to keep if not check totally the limit of the White House to reinforce the Contras.

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005