**psychology** will give brainliest ¡¡50 what are the strengths and weaknesses of adler's inferiority complex?

The greatest strength of the Adlerian therapy style is its focus on a holistic return to community. By keeping healthy reorientation into society as a goal for personal and individual improvement, Adlerian theory allows for a realistic approach to therapy. This is not performed in a vacuum, assuming the person will only deal with themselves after therapy. It maintains a strong focus on how the individuals receiving therapy can alter their perceptions and grow their personal strengths to better fit into their own communities. It is this desire to support the individual person's innate sense of belonging that is its main strength.  

Another important strength of this therapy is its use of encouragement and empowerment. The person undergoing the therapy is empowered through positive encouragement to become a successful member of his or her community. The idea is that in changing the way you look at and responds to the community, you can become a part of that same community and fulfill a deep-seated need to belong.  

Adlerian therapy is flexible. It highlights feelings of anxiety and inferiority which can be explored through many different styles of therapy, such as play, art, and talk therapies. It can also be used in group and couple's therapy scenarios. This, in turn, makes Adlerian therapy appropriate for any age group.  

Its goals are sustainable in that they encourage insight and personal growth even after therapy has finished. This promotes confidence and self-worth, which leads a person to interact naturally in society and build interactive, healthy relationships within his or her own community.

cur

explanation:

cancer

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is