The tone of hamlets soliloquy at the end of act iii, scene ii is significantaly different than the tone of the previous three. what is the tone of the fourth soliloquy? quote at least a few words from it to support your interpretation

Hamlet's fourth soliloquy is the famous "to be or not to be" speech that he contemplates whether to go forward with his planned murder scheme.

Explanation:

In William Shakespeare's tragedy play "Hamlet", we see the character of the young prince Hamlet trying to avenge his father's death. His soliloquys are the passageway to understand his inner conflicts that he dare not share with others. While the previous speeches can be the same in their plans to kill Claudius, the fourth "to be or not to be" soliloquy is different in his approach of how to get rid of the murderer. Here, he includes himself in the casualties, contemplating sui cide which had not been included in the previous soliloquys. His desperation can be seen in this soliloquy.

To die, to sleep—

No more—and by a sleep to say we end

The heartache and the thousand natural shocks

That flesh is heir to—’tis a consummation

Devoutly to be wished! To die, to sleep.

To sleep, perchance to dream—ay, there’s the rub,

For in that sleep of death what dreams may come .

He seems to be stuck between fighting against his uncle of killing himself so that this pain will end, and he will "sleep" forever. This is the first time he thinks of hurting himself in his plans to avenge his father's murder at the hands of his uncle Claudius.

especially research the treaty of greenville and the treaty of colerain in washington's administration.   also research at least one significant treaty from the administrations of adams, jefferson, and madison. tell the outcome of each treaty and how it did or did not in the further development of the west.

treaty of greenville (1814) the treaty of greenville (1814) was called a treaty of peace and friendship between the united states of america and the tribes of native americans called the wyandots, delawares, shawanoese, senacas and miamies.

the treaty of colerain was signed at st. marys, georgia in camden county, georgia, by benjamin hawkins, george clymer, and andrew pickens for the united states and representatives of the creek nation, for whom indian trader langley bryant served as an interpreter, on june 29, 1796, proclaimed on march 18, 1797, and codified as 7 stat. 56. colerain was a small community and the site of a u.s. indian factory founded by james seagrove.  

this treaty affirmed the binding of the treaty of new york (1790). the treaties of hopewell and the treaty of holston (1791) established boundary lines between the choctaws, chickasaws, cherokee, and the u.s. the treaty of colerain bound the creek nation to acknowledge the boundaries established in those treaties.  

it also established the boundary line between the creek nation and the united states. at the time of this treaty, the boundaries between spanish florida and the u.s. had not yet been established. this treaty formally allowed the creek chiefs to acknowledge the negotiation for delineating the georgia-florida boundary with spain.  

the treaty contained a provision that the president of the u.s. may establish a trading or military outpost.  

the united states demanded that the creeks give up their american prisoners and also return all "citizens, white inhabitants, negroes and property" taken by the creeks.  

the treaty describes when it would take effect. after the treaty had been signed but not yet promulgated, the u.s. senate requested modification of two articles of the treaty. the first modification stipulated that the military or trading posts would be under the control of the united states. the second modification stipulated that if the u.s. no longer required the use of those posts, the locations would revert to the creek people.  

it is a because im a fod nigba