subject
History, 22.06.2019 01:00 lovelarissa

In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u. s. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the united states. should the same policy be applied today against u. s. muslims or muslim immigrants? why or why not? are these forms of internment different from native reservations? if so how? if not, why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What is one way that the congress of vienna changed the map of europe?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
How did access to and rivers the progress of industriation in britain
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:40
What are the vedas? a. regions ruled by a vedic king b. a group of female hindu saints c. a tribe native to north india d. a collection of ancient hindu scriptures e. the autobiography of a saint
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
17 million negroes cannot do as you suggest qnd wait for the hearts of men to change. tjis we cannot do unless we persue aggressively goals which all other americans achieved ove 150 years ago. how might martin luther king jr. respond to this statement?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u. s. government to order the internment of a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 03:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 03:01
question
Mathematics, 02.09.2020 03:01
Questions on the website: 13722359