What were the terms behind germany's surrender during wwi?

The reason why Germany surrendered during WWI was because of many factors. Germany was bound to lose the war, so they decided that they didn't want to continue with the war. Germany was in a HUGE shortage of food, due to the fact that the Allies made a blockage that blocked incoming food supplies from getting into the battle field, and without food, the soldiers can't fight the war because they will be starving. No enemies were near Germany's borders, while there were Germany soldiers that were in the Allies territories, so that means that Germany can't aid the soldiers because they would be going too far from their territory, or the land they conquered. Because of all of this, Germany's hopes for winning the war has fallen, and signed an armistice with the Allies.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answer: representation of human experiences

explanation: