If humanity has passed the point where the oil supply is declining, which suggests the most practical response?

Peak oil is the theorized point in time when the maximum rate of extraction of petroleum is reached, after which it is expected to enter terminal decline.[2] Peak oil theory is based on the observed rise, peak, fall, and depletion of aggregate production rate in oil fields over time. It is often confused with oil depletion; however, whereas depletion refers to a period of falling reserves and supply, peak oil refers to the point of maximum production. The concept of peak oil is often credited to geologist M. King Hubbert whose 1956 paper first presented a formal theory.

For several years now we have been hearing about the decline in oil production, that oil is not a renewable source of energy, and that at some point, this fuel will end. There are many theories that speak about this phenomenon, like the Peak Oil Theory, which clarifies the difference between declining, and total absence of the resource. However that may be, the reality is, that at some point humanity may not have more sources of oil, and most, if not all, aspects of life will start to fail, as we are overly dependent on this resource.

The most practical response to this declining of oil production and extraction, whether it is a simple decline, or an actual ending of the sources, is to continue with the research being done on alternate sources of fuel: the use of solar power, nuclear power, and other energetic sources, such as water power, and the use of certain alcohols, like ethanol, or the gases produced by waste.

The use of electrical power is not logical because most electrical plants require oil to function and gas is not an option as it seems that its reserves are also running low, just like oil.

- "a new era of american politics began with jackson's election in 1828, but it also completed a grand social experiment begun by the american revolution. nevertheless, jacksonian democracy represented a provocative blending of the best and worst qualities of american society."

< 3

the hollywood film industry of 1950 was threatened on several different fronts. television broadcasting was rapidly becoming the dominant entertainment medium in the united states. the paramount anti-trust consent decree requiring separate ownership for production companies and theater chains had gone into effect on 1 january 1950. large numbers of young men and women were marrying, having children, and moving to the suburbs, which affected the viability of downtown first-run movie theaters. foreign revenues were endangered by protectionist tactics including quota systems, high taxes, and blocked funds. finally, the morality and patriotism of hollywood films and filmmakers were under attack from government, religious, and citizens' groups.

explanation: