What was established in the case of miranda v. arizona? how does this affect the legal proces

in Miranda v. Arizona 1966 the supreme court ruled that detained criminal suspects prior to police questioning, must be informed if their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. Miranda appealed to the u.s supreme court.

new evidence is discovered.

oversights and errors are corrected,

new technology is applied to evidence.

the punishment for breaking the law would depend on the conditions or the seriousness of the law being broken, if he or she breaks the law while doing some great discovery or invention then it would classify as a scientific fraud. there are other words to describe the crime but scientific fraud would be the harshest one.