How were monks and friars similar? how did they differ from eachother?

The monks were block themsleves from the community and friars lived with the community.

A friar and a monk can be similar, because monks can be like friars who depend on charity for living but since some monks live in the mainstream society, who rely more on praying than actively living in a convent, this is how monks and friars differ

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.

the quran was sent by an angel to muhhamad   which made up the quran they beiliev that there is on   god who controls everything and they believ every prophet lived jesus and the jews prophet