subject
History, 28.01.2020 07:31 ayoismeisalex

The know-nothing party seemed to be one of contradictions: they wanted to limit the rights of immigrants, while promoting an – agenda. why would a political party argue for limiting the rights of one group, but expanding the rights of another? while they did rally against certain groups, like –, it was mainly because these groups didn’t support the same ideals for which they stood, including abolition and –. ultimately, the know-nothings actually accomplished very little in limiting the rights of immigrants. all european immigrants benefited from being –. these groups had the advantage of being able to –, while free blacks could not.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:50
What was a common consequence if sir edwin sandys system of indentured servitude
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
The 1884 amendment added onto the chinese exclusion act included what additional stipulation? the law would apply to ethnic chinese regardless of which asian country they originated from. the law would provide newly arrived chinese immigrants with land in the oklahoma territory. the law would establish all chinese americans as permanent aliens and deny them citizenship. the law would prohibit chinese immigrants from reentering the united states once they exited.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
How long have counties been a part of the government structure of the united states?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
How did toussaint l’ouverture become a leader of the haitian colonies
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The know-nothing party seemed to be one of contradictions: they wanted to limit the rights of immig...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722361