How did mustafa kemal differ from abd al-aziz ibn saud?

a. kemal made turkey a more traditional nation, while ibn saud modernized saudi arabia.
b. kemal modernized turkey, while ibn saud made saudi arabia a more traditional nation.
c. kemal maintained islamic law in turkey, while ibn saud created a hereditary monarchy in saudi arabia.
d. kemal created a hereditary monarchy in turkey, while ibn saud maintained islamic law in saudi arabia.

B. Kemal modernized Turkey, while Ibn Saud made Saudi Arabia a more traditional nation.

Explanation:

B. Kemal modernized Turkey, while Ibn Saud made Saudi Arabia a more traditional nation.

Explanation:

The motivation behind why did Mustafa Kemal vary from Abd al-Aziz Ibn Saud is a result of A, Kemal made Turkey a more traditional nation,, while Ibn Saud modernized Saudi Arabia.

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was a Turkish armed force officer, progressive, and originator of the Republic of Turkey, filling in as its first President from 1923 until his death in 1938.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.