Read the sentence below and answer the following question: if that was a disagreement, then mount everest is an ant hill and the mississippi river is a trickle. which answer correctly summarizes the meaning of this sentence? a sarcastic statement suggesting the argument was not bad at all a satirical statement describing the subject of the argument an ironic statement suggesting that something loud can also be small an understatement describing a bad argument using an analogy

The correct answer is D) an understatement describing a bad argument using an analogy.

The answer that correctly summarizes the meaning of the sentence is "an understatement describing a bad argument using an analogy."

The understatement here is that it presents something less or minor, or not better as, compared to the original idea. The expression was "if that was a disagreement, then Mount Everest is an ant hill and the Mississippi River is a trickle. So the expression refers to an exaggeration or an argument used incorrectly when an analogy was present.

the three-fifths compromise was proposed by james wilson and roger sherman, who were both delegates for the constitutional convention of 1787. however, the three-fifth compromise has its roots further back in history, dating back to the continental congress in 1783. the compromise was a result of the apportionment of taxes being related to land values.

hope this : )

your stuuupid lolz

explanation: