How did the conquests of alexander the great
lead to the development of the hellenistic civilization?

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!

globalization can mean many things

the three main concepts are 1 bushiness

buiness is something thatch part of globalization a lot

which manly gives its name   but there are other actors

another 1 is communication

communication is another bold factor in globalization and wouldn't even exsist without communication

last and third is   goverment and poltics

poltics is a big but small factor it takes part of deciding peoples minds during polticis   and choosing people for the job but sometimes doesn't