What was the result of the freedom rides?

a. none of the above are true.

b. all of the students made it successfully to new orleans, although they endured violence along the way.

c. the students were able to get the buses desegregated after some legal effort.

d. the remaining students who persevered through alabama were promptly arrested in mississippi?

The correct answer is D. The remaining students who persevered through Alabama were promptly arrested in Mississippi.

Explanation:

The Freedom Ride is the name of a form of resistance that emerged from the US Civil Rights Movement. The so-called Freedom Riders participated in the abolition of state-sanctioned segregation by driving in intercity buses to the southern United States to the implementation of the Supreme Court decisions in Morgan v. Virginia and Boyton v. Virginia, to test the prohibition of segregation in public transport, restaurants and waiting rooms.

The first Freedom Ride left Washington, D.C. on May 4, 1961, and was to reach New Orleans on May 17. The aim of the trip was to test and sue for the status quo and local laws in a joint drive by whites and blacks. The voyage and violent protests that were provoked gave the Civil Rights Movement a boost and first drew attention to the problem among American citizens and later the world. Participants were arrested partly for trespassing, unlawful assembly and violation of state and local laws.

The Freedom Riders had committed themselves to non-violent resistance before the voyage, but were aware that they might face arrests and riots.

the enslaved people onboard suffered from illness with some frequency

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.