What was the main criticism of the current texas constitution behind the ratliff-junell proposal for a new constitution? a. the constitution gave the executive branch too much power over the legislative process. b.the constitution was too restrictive and cumbersome for contemporary government. c.the constitution allowed for too many corrupt interest groups to control texas politics. d.the constitution was too old to be representative of modern people. e.the constitution was too easy to amend?

.d.the constitution was too old to be representative of modern people.e.the constitution was too easy to amend?

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

they charge for servic mark me brainliest