Can someone me answer this question !

do you think that filmmakers have a duty to represent historical events accurately, or do you think they should have artistic license to make a film the way they like?

It all depends on how the film is being depicted. (For example: Titanic, it was historically accurate in an aspect but what difference would it make if it wasn’t) If it’s meant to be educational and “showcase” the event, then yes it should be historically accurate. If it’s meant as a comedy like Hercules, then it kind of doesn’t matter

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!

du boi was considered a radical because he wanted the immediate end for segregation. the biggest different between him and booker t. washington is that, even though washington believed that segregation should be considered illegal, he did not believe at all that a law was needed to keep blacks away from whites and that this would be something natural (to have the races apart) for a long time until society adjusted, while du boi believe that agitation was the only way to end segregation.