Which statement is true about the supreme court’s ruling in hazelwood school district v. kuhlmeier

It claimed that "the First Amendment does not safeguard the rights of public school students to publish information in school-sponsored publications."

The Supreme Court ruled 5-3 in favor of the school, upholding its authority to control material in school-sponsored periodicals.

The magazine was not meant to be a public forum, but instead a limited platform for journalism students to produce pieces that were subject to university editing and fit the standards of that Journalism class, according to the Supreme Court.

The school had the authority to ban the publishing of pieces they thought were unsuitable since the daily was funded by the school.

Learn more:

link

The correct answer is the last choice, "It stated that the rights of public school students to publish content in school sponsored newspapers is not protected by the First Amendment."

Explanation:

The decision by the Supreme Court was decided by a 5-3 vote, which upheld the school's right to censor articles in school sponsored newspapers. The Supreme Court stated that the newspaper was not intended as a public forum but rather a limited forum for journalism students to write articles subject to school editing that met the requirements of that Journalism class. Since the paper was sponsored by the school. the school had the right to prevent the publication of articles they felt were inappropriate.

the option which was not a function of missionaries in the northwest was the first one - they established posts for trading furs and other goods.

missionaries were sent around the world to spread religion and their knowledge and others - they were not merchants who sold furs and other goods.