The supreme court ruled in favor of the cherokee nation in 1832 because indian removal was contrary to
select the best answer from the choices provided.
manifest destiny
the constitution
indian assimilation
the spoils system

i think that it would be tenth of the first

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

immigrants from northern and western europe continued coming as they had for three centuries, but in decreasing numbers

the modern census, which measured household size, marital status, and employment, began in

a.

egypt

b.

china

c.

canada

d.

united states

select the best answer from the choices provided

a

b

c

d