Historians overestimate the destruction caused by wwii. though large cites were devastated, small farming towns were mostly untouched. in fact, most european farmers were barely aware that the war was happening at all. which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draw a valid conclusion a) determine how many battles during world war ii took place near small farming towns. b) identify which countries formed alliances with one another during wwii. c) watch historians footage of bombings that destroyed large european urban centers. d) accuse the essay writer of being biased against people who live is small towns.

A) Determine how many battles during World War II took place near small farming towns.

Explanation:

In order to be able to determine wether the passage draw a valid conclusion a historian could look the geographical position of battles fought in WWII and determine how many of them affected rural farming towns, and after that see how many rural farming towns there are on the countries where WWII was fought and see if the proportion represents a significant number of rural towns affected.

ok so i only know that

pirlalta-2

kino-4

serra-7

menedez-1

coronado-5

but just a heads up if you need on things like this you can make an account for quiz-let and it will give you the answers ur looking for.

you didn't post an image.