Why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation a. events happening at the same time might have influenced one another b. every historical interpretation must consider the political and social consequences of an event. c. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. d. historical interpretations are only valid if they are written in a similar context as the event.

Explanation:

First of all, ''context'' refers to social, religious and economic variables, that's why they must be included in every social event that's being analysed, because all these variables influence one on another. For example, economy is influenced by religion due to the perception it gives it (rich are mean and poor are spiritual).

On the other hand, social behaviour and events are defined by other circumstances like religion because it was set a bunch of rules of proper human behaviour according to sacred scriptures.

So, at the end, interpreting history becomes a really difficult activity because is a multi variable science.

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.