Few rights are more critical to a well-functioning democratic system then free speech. consider the difference between the supreme court's statement in schenk v u. s. (1919) the government has the power to punish speech that poses "a clear and present danger" to the functioning of the government and its statement in texas v. johnson (1989) that "government may not prohibit expression simply because it disagrees with its message." how did the court's position on speech evolve in the 70 years between these two cases?

8 - (2a + 7) = a + 40     distribute/multiply - into (2a + 7)

8 - 2a - 7 = a + 40

1 - 2a = a + 40       add 2a on both sides

1 = 3a + 40         subtract 40 on both sides

-39 = 3a       divide 3 on both sides

-13 = a

[proof]

8 - (2a + 7) = a + 40

8 - (2(-13) + 7) = -13 + 40

8 - (-26 + 7) = 27

8 - (-19) = 27

8 + 19 = 27

27 = 27

1) she is extremely upset

to keep us neatruel and not get involved in any wars

he assumed control of treaty negotiations with a hostile power

depending on what kind of map for example a pltical maps works in many ways this iss how it works it shows the areas and places the democratics and the repbulcicans reside for example if   texas chooses trump for president there a republican state and if   califronia chooses hillary there a democratic state.