Which of the following best describes a difference between enslaved people in cities and those on plantations in the 1800s? enslaved people in cities were not considered to be property, while enslaved people on plantations were thought of as property. enslaved people in cities often kept some of their wages, while enslaved people on plantations never saw any of the money they made for their owners. enslaved people on plantations could learn a trade or a skill, while enslaved people in cities were thought of as unskilled labor. enslaved people on plantations did less manual labor, while enslaved people in cities spent many more hours doing backbreaking work.

enslaved people in cities were not considered to be property, while enslaved people on plantations were thought of as property.

Explanation:

Enslaved people in cities were not considered to be property, while enslaved people on plantations were thought of as property.

Explanation:

Enslaved people were not considered to be property because they had the opportunity to hire themselves out. They enjoyed higher degree of freedom of movement, meeting free black people and opportunities for learning than enslaved people on plantations.

On the other hand, enslaved people on plantations were seen as property that cannot hire themselves out. They were badly treated and their freedom was highly restricted with no freedom of movement and opportunities for learning. They worked like donkeys on the plantations and often traded just like an ordinary product.

idk you know what i mean hahahaha

how did justinian contribute to the byzantine empire?

one famous byzantine emperor was justinian i. justinian ruled from ad 527 to 565. belisarius was the commander who led these armies in an attempt to win back the old western roman empire. the war effort to take back the western part of the empire forced justinian to raise taxes on the people of the byzantine empire.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!